Reynolds Rap

Hello!

Let me re-introduce myself, my name is Donald J. Trump, and I'm seeking re-election as President of the United States of America.

I believe this re-introduction is necessary. To begin, I'm not a politcian, I'm a businessman, born and raised in New York. Without regard to the financial success I've achieved, please keep in mind, like many New Yorkers I learned nothing comes easy. I learned I had to be extremely resourceful, tenacious, scrappy, resilient, and to fight to acquire success, fight to sustain success, and in order to become more successful I've fought every challenge by consistently practicing discipline and commitment to achieve objectives. Please, re-read the previous sentence.

Yes, I've had enormous business success, and likewise, I've endured countless challenges, and learned from my own mistakes and failures that would have easily crushed the majority of my contemporaries, especially my political opponents who've never run a business, never had to make payroll for their staff, never had to deal with the conflicting bureaucracies of local, state, federal, and international laws that literally crush U.S. business growth. Remember Braniff Airlines, Oldsmobile, TWA, Enron, Toys R Us, Blockbuster, Sears, Montgomery Ward, etc., and the millions of jobs lost? You do remember, don't you? The current President of the United States was serving in Congress (1973 to 2009) or in the White House (2009 to the present) continuously for fifty-one-(51) years - throughout the demise of these legendary American businesses.


1928 to 1982	1897 to 2004	1930 to 2003	1985 to 2007	1948 to 2018	1985 to 2010

Let's not ignore the perpetually increasing trade deficit with China, which only I began to reduce during my first term as POTUS!

Most importantly, U.S. car manufacturers used to dominate 83.39% of the U.S. car market, but Japanese and Korean car manufactueres (Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Hyundai, IKia, Subaru, Mazda, and Mitsubishi) have collectively reduced the sale of U.S. made cars in our own market to less than 40%. Again, what about the millions of American jobs lost? Why don't U.S. car manufacturers have the same "open access" to sale our products in foreign markets? Why?

Is it fair for Boeing, a private U.S. aerospace manufacturer and formerly the world's largest manufacturer of airliners, to compete against Airbus, an European aerospace company jointly owned and financed by the governments of France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom, which propelled Airbus to become the world's largest manufacturer of airliners? The perpetual failure of politicians to support U.S. businesses both domestically and internationally truly exists as the greatest threat to democracy!

Again, I'm a businessman and I've been able to thrive, but I've had to fight to do so. The role of POTUS requires a fighter, a fighter with robust domestic and international business acumen to be a champion for the citizens of the United States of American; that's who I am, that's what my campaign represents. You do realize, don't you, that my political opponents and those talking heads in mainstream media, especially those who liked me prior to becoming POTUS then flip-flopped to hating me when I became POTUS, do not possess any where near the character and scope of my domestic and international business acumen. They can only launch personal attacks against me to establish the presidential election as a "popularity contest," instead of assessing which candidate actually possesses the skills, knowlege, and demonstrated proficiencies to direct the largest "business" in the entire world.

Beginning today, I'm changing the narrative of how I engage my opponents and mainstream media, which I'll explain letter in this letter. But before I do, it's imperative I address several elephants in the room.

Some people have said very negative, hateful things about me; even blatant lies about me, which includes intentionally, maliciously distorting what my candidacy represents. Frequently these allegations have been endorsed and heavily promoted by mainstream news media, including on their talking-head programs for poorly-conceived comedic effect. Such venomous language has prompted death threats upon me, and on July 13, 2024 an attempt to kill me by Thomas Matthew Crooks; which was followed by an assassination attempt by Ryan Wesley Routh on September 15, 2024.

Extremely ugly, EVIL things have been said about me with absolutely no regard for the impact of their lies or actions on members of my family. As a New Yorker, some attacks I won't tolerate. Would you?

Again, I'm a fighter, and when faced with lies and contempt about me, or my family, or what my campaign represents, I really don't care about being "politically correct," and frankly, neither would you; because like me, you know the importance of protecting what's yours!

The unprosecuted hate crime of my beheading
on May 30, 2017 by pseudo-comedian Kathy Griffin

This election functions more like a "popularity contest" than a merit-based assessment validating skills, knowledge and proficiencies successfully leading an extremely diverse "business" with multi-site, multi-state and international operations. Consequently, again, in response to personal attacks I respond in kind. However, to bring closure to a few big ticket items used by my opponents and mainstream media to against me, the following is my final tit-for-tat.

RACISM: My political opponents and mainstream media gleefully and repeatedly allege I'm racist, while intentionally ignoring and refusing to convey my extremely robust and well-documented history of egalitarianism. Here's a brief laundry list:

1. Unlike my wealthy and political contemporaries like Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Hillary Clinton, etc., in 1984 and 1988 I supported Jesse Jackson's candidacy for POTUS both financially and publicly (watch the video below), That's right, I didn't care about being "politically correct," I publicly supported a Black man for POTUS; but when I simply question the ligitimacy of Obama's presidential candidacy I'm labeled a racist.

2. I personally promoted nineteen-(19) of boxer Mike Tyson's fifty-eight-(58) professional fights; but I'm labeled a racist.

3. In the 4th season of The Apprentice (2005-06), I selected Randal Pinkett as the first Black person to win; but I'm labeled a racist.

4. In the 12th season of Celebrity Apprentice (2011-12), I selected comedian Arsenio Hall as the winner; but I'm labeled a racist.

5. Like hundreds of innocent U.S. citizens, Sarah Root, 21, from Omaha, Nebraska was killed when SUV was rear-ended by Eswin Mejia, an illegal alien from Honduras, who was street racing on January 31, 2016. Mejia illegally entered the U.S. through Mexico. Millions of illegal aliens, including criminals and other undesirables traverse unfettered from beyond and throughout Mexico's entire country to enter the U.S. illegally; but when I accurately identify Mexico's culpability I'm labeled a racist.

6. Like hundreds of innocent U.S. citizens, on May 6th 2017 on the way back from DisneyLand, Ingrid Lake's car was struck by a drunk driver. The accident severely injured her 6 year old son Lennox. The driver of the vehicle Constantino Banda Acosta, was previously deported over 15 times before the accident; but when I accurately identify Mexico's culpability for allowing criminals and other undesirables to traverse unfettered from beyond and throughout Mexico's entire country to enter the U.S. illegally I'm labeled a racist.

7. During my administraton as POTUS, as reported by CNN on September 6, 2019 my economic policies propelled Black unemployment to a legendary low - to 5.5% from 6%, according to the Labor Department data. The previous record low of 5.9% was set in May 2018, also during my administration. Unemployment among workers who identify themselves as Hispanic or Latino also fell in August to 4.2%, which matched a record low set earlier that year; but I'm labeled a racist.

8. During my administraton as POTUS, I signed the "bipartisan" First Step Act, that reduced the sentences of over 1,000 incarcerated men by seventy-(70) months - of whom 90% were Black; but I'm labeled a racist.

9. During my administraton as POTUS, I signed the Music Modernization Act, which dramatically improved copyright protection and compensation for recording artists and performers, especially legacy Black recording artists; but I'm labeled a racist.

10. During my administraton as POTUS, I promoted passage of the School Choice Act to provide minorities with access to better schools, because as researched and reported by Owens and Reardon's "The State of Segregation: 70 Years After Brown," 75% of Black students attended segregated schools in 1968 which continued to increase throughout previous presidential administrations. As reported by the Economic Policy Institute and the UCLA Civil Rights Project 80% or more of Black students still attend segregated schools; but although I attempted to provide "all" students with access to better educational opportunities, I'm labeled a racist.

11. During my administraton as POTUS, I promoted passage of major immigration reform to reduce or prevent criminals and other undesirables from entering the United States; notably, as researched and presented to the U.S. Congress in 2008 by Gerald A. Reynolds, Chairman of the United States Commission on Civil Rights in the special report, "The Impact of Illegal Immigrationon the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers: A Briefing Before The United States Commission on Civil Rights - Held in Washington, DC - Briefing Report," with additional research by Dr. Vernon Briggs, Black people are significant victims of job losses and lowered wages as a direct result of the mass, low-skilled immigration that has occurred since 1965, with over one-(1) million fewer Black people working due to illegal immigration; but because of my commitment for major reform to reduce or prevent illegal immigration I'm labeled a racist.

12. During my administraton as POTUS, I signed an Executive Order 89 that expanded the designation of Enterprise Zones and created the Revitalization Council; but I'm labeled a racist.

13. During my administraton as POTUS, in June 2018, after serving 21 years in prison for a non-violent crime, I authorized clemency for Alice Johnson, convicted in 1996 for her involvement in a Memphis cocaine trafficking organization and sentenced to life imprisonment; but I'm labeled a racist.

14. During my administraton as POTUS, unlike my predecessors including President Obama, in 2018, I posthumously pardoned legendary Black boxer Jack Johnson (March 31, 1878 – June 10, 1946), who was convicted in June 1913 on charges of violating the Mann Act—forbidding one to transport a White woman across state lines for "immoral purposes," which resulted in Johnson's "immoral and racist" incarceration at the federal penitentiary at Leavenworth; but I'm labeled a racist.

15. During my administraton as POTUS, as reported by the Associated Press on December 19, 2019, I signed a bipartisan bill to permanently provide more than $250 million a year to the nation’s historically black colleges and universities (HBCU), along with dozens of other institutions that serve large shares of minority students, which increased funding by fourteen-(14) percent;

“When I took office, I promised to fight for HBCUs, and my administration continues to deliver,” Trump said. “A few months ago, funding for HBCUs was in jeopardy. But the White House and Congress came together and reached a historic agreement.”

But I'm still labeled a racist.

You know the phrase, "No good deed goes unpunished!"

SEXISM: I'll never apologize for being a healthy heterosexual male who greatly values the intelligence and beauty of women. Most importantly, unlike the very public flaunting of adulterous relationships by former President Bill Clinton (Eileen Wellstone, Sandra Allen James, Karen Hinton, Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, Leslie Millwee, Monica Lewinsky) and Kamala Harris (Willie Brown, Montel Williams, etc.), which occurred before and while they functioned as elected officials, it's never been my practice to publicly flaunt my intimate relationships, because it's nobody's business but mine. Conversely, my political opponents and mainstream media hold me up to perpetual public ridicule and scorn as they gleefully and repeatedly allege I'm sexist, while intentionally ignoring and refusing to convey my extremely robust history of egalitarianism. Again, here's a brief laundry list:

1. First things first, as a career businessman - not a politician like Kamala Harris and the co-dependent to President Clinton's public promiscuity, Hillary Clinton; I've always been immediately responsible for and I've successfully managed my business affairs in compliance with AA/EEO, including all of my multimedia interests (such as “The Apprentice,” Miss USA, etc.) to objectively recognize women and minorities. As conveyed during the "live" Republican National Convention by Ivanka Trump, The Trump Organization, a leader in the hospitality industry, has more women executives than male executives. In the 1980s, I hired Barbara Res as one of several women hired or promoted into prominent positions in my company. Barbara Res was the Trump Organization’s head of construction, which included some of my biggest projects, including the construction of Trump Tower and the renovation of New York’s Plaza Hotel; but I'm labeled sexist.

2. In the 3rd season of The Apprentice (2004-05), I selected Kendra Todd as the winner, the first female candidate, and the youngest, to be hired on the U.S. Apprentice; but I'm labeled sexist.

3. In the 6th season of The Apprentice (2006-07), I selected Stefanie Schaeffer as the winner; but I'm labeled sexist.

4. In the 8th season of Celebrity Apprentice (2008-09), I selected comedian Joan Rivers as the winner; but I'm labeled sexist.

5. In the 10th season of The Apprentice (2010-11), I selected Brandy Kuentzel as the winner; but I'm labeled sexist.

6. In the 14th season of The Apprentice (2014-15), I selected Leeza Gibbons as the winner; but I'm labeled sexist.

7. For the very first time in any presidential administration, I appointed two women to command the top two public-facing roles — press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, and communications director Hope Hicks, with women holding 62% of my presidential press corp; but I'm labeled sexist.

8. The far-left leaning Johnny-come-lately "cancel culture" movement has established any past, current, or future "behavior" deemed unacceptable is essentially equivalent to a criminal act, a felony. However, there's overt inconsistency in their labeling. For example:

CLICK ABOVE IMAGE TO WATCH VIDEO

I've always been a fervent supporter of women's rights, especially Title IX, and that "biological" females only compete against other "biological" females - which doesn't mean I'm against transgender individuals or the LGBT+ movement, but for women; nevertheless, I'm labeled as sexist.

Again, you know the phrase, "No good deed goes unpunished!"

POPULARITY: I didn't seek the presidency to become "popular" or to become more popular. Again, decades before launching my first presidential campaign I'd worked very hard to establish the Trump "brand," as a leader in the hospitality industry both domestically and internationally. Plus, as validated by my IMBD page, I was already very "popular" as a producer, actor, and writer. Get it?

Simply put, I sought the presidency because I was and remain tired of seeing the U.S. being ripped-off by other nations.

As captured in the video at right, thirty-six-(36) years ago on the April 25, 1988 telecast of the Oprah Winfrey program, I conveyed my disdain for how politicians have allowed the U.S. to lose both domestic and international markets, the perpetual loss of manufacturing jobs, the trade imbalance with China, Japan, and OPEC that's made the U.S. a debtor nation. Again, I was and remain tired of seeing the U.S. being ripped-off by other nations.

Clearly, in 1988 I said exactly what I'd do "if" I ran for POTUS, and that's exactly what I did during my first term as POTUS.

In comparison, the current POTUS and VPOTUS returned the U.S. to again being a debtor nation, and perceived throughout the world as weak for being unable to protect its own border.

        

Some people think I don't have the experience and the knowledge of the law, the knowledge of politics to be president, and those people are wrong. I'm a businessman, and I remain the most qualified candidate to lead the largest "business" in the entire world!

As validated by the dismal economic performance of the current presidential administration, my opponents not only lack business acumen, but are also ignorant of how to successfully link economic growth with the launch, maintainenance, and expansion of critically important social programs, especially Social Security and healthcare.

As I mentioned previously, I'm changing the narrative of how I engage my opponents and mainstream media. Simply put, from this point forward, my language will primarily involve "generally accepted" business terminology, practices and principles, and equally important, how to successfully link economic growth with the launch, maintainenance, and expansion of critically important social programs, especially Social Security and healthcare. Conversely, my oponents will continue to "brand" the presidential election as a "personality contest," because they've consistently demonstrated a lack subject matter expertise to successfully run the largest business in the world. My opponents fully expect the voters to fall prey to their extremly divisive propaganda. Keep in mind, "they" told you when I became POTUS, with my finger on the nuclear button, I'd start a nuclear war. Instead, no new wars occurred during my administration; conversely, the current administration involved the U.S. in two new wars, between Russia and Ukrain, and Israel and Hamas and its likely regional expansion via Iran, Hezbollah, Houthi, etc. Wake up, and ignore being brainwashed by my opponents.

Of course, expect them to attack my business history (smile), which is exactly what people do who have absolutely no business history! Again, I'm a businessman and I've been able to survive and thrive, but I've had to fight to do so. I know what it takes to stay on top; my opponents don't. The role of POTUS requires a fighter, a fighter with robust domestic and international business acumen to be a champion for the citizens of the United States of American; that's who I am, that's what my campaign represents.

Most respectfully, I won't talk over anyone's head, but the "enlightenment" I provide will profoundly detail the ignorance and failure of my political opponents who've never run a business, never had to make payroll for their staff, never had to deal with the conflicting bureaucracies of local, state, federal, and international laws that literally crush U.S. business growth.

I'm a fighter. I'm fighting for you!

Surviving an assassination attempt at a campaign rally near Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024

My name is Donald J. Trump

If you're indecisive about who I am and what I represent, click the links below to learn facts, learn the truth - these are NOT "my facts," oh, no. These are public facts available to anyone, including the overtly bias "fake news" mainstream media.

THREAT TO DEMOCRACY:
Fiscal malfeasence. Incompetence. Ineptness.
The real threat to democracy is career politician Kamala Harris' non-existent "business acumen," which she combined with master career politician Joe Biden's non-existent "business acumen," as they did this:

TO ENLARGE ABOVE GRAPHIC, CLICK HERE.

Can you see how consistent and truthful he is, you can take any interview, from any period, and it's like hearing him speak 2 days ago. @Zanzibar2Far (3 years ago)

As captured in the video above thirty-six-(36) years ago on the April 25, 1988 telecast of the "Oprah Winfrey" program, on "BBC HARDtalk" in 1998, and on "Face the Nation" in January 2016, Trump has consistently conveyed his disdain for the U.S. perpetual failures of U.S. politicians, and exactly what he'd do "if" he ran for POTUS.

As a successful businessman, and producer of diverse film and broadcast media content with robust knowledge of the film industry, I simply got tired of . . .

As a successful businessman, required to pay or re-negotiate my financial obligations, I simply got tired of . . .

The greatest threat to democracy are the weak political and military initiatives represented by the current and previous POTUS

Proudly demonstrating a commitment to peace and democracy, I became the first sitting U.S. president to enter North Korea and meet with Supreme Leader, Kim Jong Un on June 30, 2019

Proudly demonstrating a commitment to peace and democracy, I've had many positive meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin

Proudly demonstrating a commitment to peace and democracy, I met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and presented details of my administration’s Middle East Peace Plan on January 28, 2020

Proudly established sanctions to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power and terrorist-power; but Biden/Harris eliminated sanctions, which resulted in Hamas attacking Israel on October 7th

As demonstrated throughout my life, I'm less concerned about being “politically correct” and more concerned about achieving strategic economic and political objectives that will directly benefit working people, my companies and the entire business community, and especially the United States. Unfortunately, the veracity of my communications has consistently been "re-imagined, re-packaged, and manipulated" with overt and negative bias against me by mainstream media. Please, click the following link to read: The Ruling Class by John Stossel.

The greatest threat to democracy is to refuse to accept challenge and dissent; just because someone is the "projected" winner of a presidential election doesn't mean they've won!

Absolutely Phenomenal Hail Mary Plays!

NBA Craziest "Hail Mary" Shots

The greatest threat to democracy is represented by my opponents who, having never run a U.S. domestic and/or international business, lack my "keen understanding" of the intricacies of the U.S. tax code faced by the primary source of tax revenue - employees and employers!

At best, Kamala Harris will use her non-existent "business acumen" to communicate even more gibberish and nonsense.

As represented by the above content, U.S. citizens and people from outside of the United States have easily identified the "buffoonery" of Kamala Harris, and it matters! The United States of America is the single largest "business" in the world, and Kamala Harris, like Joe Biden, has absolutely no business experience. Conversely, prior to becoming POTUS, during his entire adult life, Donald Trump has traveled internationally and successfully executed business contracts throughout the entire world!

Tamala Harris is the greatest threat to democracy!

Frankly, to assess how Harris actually values "family" all you have to do is examine her choice for Vice President.

Let's stop allowing Harris to play the "Blackness card." At best, Harris' family is only "kinda" Black, with very little "Blackness" in her immediate family. Harris' "Blackness" is primarily confined to her estranged relationship with her Black-Jamaican father, her brief attendance at HBCU Howard University, and her very public affair with the former Mayor of San Francisco, Willie Brown. Let's recognize Harris' "pseudo-Blackness" for the deceitful pandering it blatantly represents.

Most importantly, let's not ignore Harris' inane support of President Biden's perpetual racism.

Let's not ignore the "Blackness card" she deceitfully uses at her convenience.

Ms. Harris contested the ruling by arguing that the judge, whose husband was a defense attorney and had spoken publicly about the importance of disclosing evidence, had a conflict of interest. Ms. Harris lost. More than 600 cases handled by the corrupt technician were dismissed.

Again, let's not ignore Harris' well-documented and perpetual indifference to the wrongful prosecution of innocent women, especially Black women.

Again, most importantly, let's not ignore Harris' inane flip-flopping from condeming Joe Biden's racism to wrongfully incarcerating innocent Black men to supporting President Biden's perpetual racism.

Just like White people, Black people are not "all the same" or monolithic, which is contrary to reporting from mainstream White-owned and controlled, liberal-left-leaning, or conservative-right-leaning media that constantly, falsely label Donald Trump as racist.

SEXISM:
He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone (John 8:7 KJV)!
Let's start with Harris' adultery, because she publicly flaunted her indifference to licentious "acts of moral turpitude" as an elected official. Conversely, Donald Trump never engaged in such "public displays" of moral depravity.

In summary, Kamala Harris:

1. publicly displayed her "moral turpitude" through blatant sexual infidelity as an elected official;

2. weaponizes and panders the "race and sex card" at her personal convenience and advantage; and

3. has absolutely no "business acumen."

The Hypocrisy of electing the deceitfulness and incompetence represented by Kamala Harris is fully captured in the YouTube.com video by Urban Voices, "Kamala Harris GOES NUCLEAR As Clip EXPOSING Her EVIL Agenda Goes Viral."

Ignore the McCarthyism-based fear campaign used by my opponent and others to "brand" me and my campaign as anti-women and anti-LGBTQIBPP+QAAPX+I+2S+.

It's not true; it's a lie.

I welcome you to have any kind of "non-criminal" relationship(s) you desire, between consenting adults, of course. 'Nuff said. Move on.

LESS GOVERNMENT, NOT MORE
Without regard to race, ethnicity, age, etc., I believe men are not better than women, and women are not better than men, they are "different," and we should respect and celebrate our differences.

Again, I believe we should respect and celebrate these difference, not eliminate them, or worse, expand the differences into an infinite number of categories, which is equally ridiculous. How ridiculous?

My opponents are career politicians who clearly don't comprehend how the federal government manages the "business" of AA/EEO. No problem, I'll enlighten them and you.

In the United States of America when applying for nearly every private sector job (EEO-1 reporting) and every public sector job (EEO-4 reporting), candidates are asked, not required, to identify their sex and race.

Who is required to file EEO-1?

1. Private sector employers with federal government contracts of $50,000 or more and 50 or more employees;

2. Private sector employers who do not have a federal government contract but have 100 or more employees; and

3. EEO-1 report must be filed annually with the EEOC by September 30. It must use employment numbers from any pay period in July through September of that year.

Who is required to file EEO-4?

The State and Local Government Information Report (EEO-4), EEOC Form 164, also referred to as the EEO-4 Report, is a mandatory biennial data collection that requires all state and local governments with 100 or more employees to submit workforce demographic data, including data by race/ethnicity, sex, job category, and salary band. The filing by eligible state and local governments is required under section 709(c) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-8(c), 29 CFR 1602.30 and .32-.37. See Appendix 5 of the EEO-5 Instruction Booklet for additional information.

Here's an example of how the data is captured via an employer's Applicant Tracking System (ATS):

Why is this required, and how is it used?

The Federal Government requires employers to provide this data as one of various tools to validate acts of discrimination. For example, here's the EEO-4 report for the State of Nebraska from 2019:

However, if race and sex are not "supposed" to be an issue, why is this data being captured? Even worse, in anticipation of claims of discrimination due to the expansion of "sex-based identities (LGBTQIBPP+QAAPX+I+2S+)," some employer began capturing such data - even though being a transgender Asian woman and a lesbian has absolutely nothing to do with performing the essential jobs functions of a Manager of Accounting.

Some employers have decided all aspects of LGBTQIBPP+QAAPX+I+2S+ are equal to race and biological sex.

For example, Kaiser Permanente Healthcare is capturing significantly more sexual information than Lincoln Financial Group (above).

Keep in mind, "supposedly" this data will not be used against the candidate, but candidates are NOT included in the decision-making process for selection and hiring; and therefore, unable validate Kaiser's claim of neutrality.

The EEOC does not require the collection and retention of such data, so: (1) why is Kaiser collecting it; (2) how will it be used; (3) how long will it be retained on Kaiser's servers; and (4) will the data be sold to third-parties?

CLICK ABOVE IMAGE TO ENLARGE

Keep in mind, it's typically easy to intentionally discriminate against minorities and women because biological women and minorities are “physically identifiable,” but such is not true of LGBTQIBPP+QAAPX+I+2S+. In order to similarly validate the LGBT+ status of candidates and employees, it would be necessary for employers to actually look “under the hood,” because LGBT+ considerations are not visually self-evident and cannot be used to immediately and uniformly discriminate.

Since employers are unable to accurately determine if a candidate is "gender fluid, or intersex, or pansexual, etc.," why is Kaiser tracking this and other sexual data, which is beyond the scope of immediate visual and physical detection? Are large multi-state and national employers like Kaiser, attempting to use the "Bully pulpit" of their national recruitment platform to manipulate state legislatures, U.S. Congress, and employers to expand "sexual tracking" to include all aspects of sexuality as represented below? Must government become even more and more involved (i.e., increased taxation to pay for required data collection and enforcement by allowing the tail to wag the dog)?

If Kaiser's data collection protocols become the "standard,"
then all EEO-1 and EEO-4 reporting will look like this!

Imagine the nightmare employers will incur to maintain and validate the accuracy of such a database, for every Job Category:

1. Officials/Administrators
2. Professionals
3. Technicians
4. Protection Services (law enforcement)
5. Paraprofessional
6. Administrative Support (Clerical)
7. Skilled Labor (Electricians, Plumbers, etc.)
8. Service/Maintenance (labor, custodians, etc.).

Do YOU really want your employer and the government to "know" the character and scope of your sexual activity? Do you really want them in your "business." What's next, bra size? Length of penis? Number of sexual partners per week, per month, per year?

Again, do YOU really want your employer and the government to "know"
the character and scope of your sexual activity? Do you really want them in "your business?"

Well, I sure don't, but that's the rabbit hole where my opponents want to take us.

Elite women and elite men are NOT physically equal,
and neither are average men and average women!

Whatever happened to parental rights?

The current "agenda" being heavily pushed by my opponents and mainstream media is that sexual differences have been replaced by sexual equality and sexual indifference; that there's no difference between men and women, that the definition of a "woman" or "man" is fluid, transitional, not etched in stone. But there do exist certain realities:

Throughout the United States, in the absence of parents engaging in criminal activity putting children at risk, including child abuse, parents have complete legal authority over their children until a child typically reaches the legal age of maturity (adulthood), between 18 or 19 years of age. However, my opponent's "idea" is to ignore parental authority, ignore evolution and biology, ignore contradictory child laws, and to even ignore common sense.

Again, sexual equality has limits, and it always will, because in the absence of copulation genocide is inevitable.

As reported by my very good friend Bill Maher of HBO's "Real Time," based on current projections by 2054 everyone in the United States will be LGBT+

Abortion? Donald Trump is pro-children; I am not anti-women.

As reported by the CDC in 2019, in the District of Columbia and 29 states that reported racial and ethnic data on abortion to the CDC, 38% of all women who had abortions in 2019 were non-Hispanic Black, while 33% were non-Hispanic White, 21% were Hispanic, and 7% were of other races or ethnicities. Notably, absolutely no men reported having an abortion.

Sixty-(60) percent, again, 60% of women, the overwhelming majority, of individuals who have abortions are women of color - but even through I'm defending helpless "children of color," I'm labeled a racist! Clearly, I value saving innocent and fragile Black lives and Latino lives, but Harris and liberal media don't tell you that; instead, they continue to "brand" me as sexist and racist.

When it comes to abortion, the judicial "opinion" that matters most, are those of affluent and powerful White men, and their subordinate and dutifully brainwashed White women. Sexism and racism has always existed with the Supreme Court, but who's there to protect the rights of the unborn, and in particular, unborn children of color? Consider the following:

In summary:

As a citizen, I don't want your employer and the government to "know" the character and scope of your sexual activity, because it's none of their business. As an employer, I don't want to create even more government bureaucracy, overhead, and taxation to count, assess, and enforce the ever expanding diversity, equity and inclusion of LGBTQIBPP+QAAPX+I+2S+, because the accounting and verification will be ambiguous and inconclusive, and more importantly, we're supposed to be evolving our country past such identity measures.

As a man, and former promoter of professional fights, including Mike Tyson, it's just WRONG for biological women to compete against biological men - it's insulting.

As a parent and grandparent, I don't want the government "teaching" my pre-teenage grandchildren curriculum their parents and I deem offensive, pornographic, racist, or otherwise unacceptable.

I support the ever expanding LGBTQIBPP+QAAPX+I+2S+ community to particicpate in the "American Dream," but not through intimidation, coercion, or at the expense of biological women and men, or the rights of parents, or to take priority over the civil rights of women, Black people, Latinos, and Native Tribes. As with the Paralympic Games, WNBA, LPGA, and other dedicated events or organizations specific to "physical characteristics," I support LGBTQIBPP+QAAPX+I+2S+ to create its own sporting events and associations, because the tail does not wag the dog.

With regard to abortion, as a parent and grandparent, I'm proudly pro-children, I'm not anti-women.

The aforementioned does not make me anti-women or anti-LGBTQIBPP+QAAPX+I+2S+.

IMMIGRATION:
It takes two to tango.
If Mexico was truly serious about controlling illegal immigration, why doesn't Mexico stop people from Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, China, Iran, Cuba, etc. from illegally entering and traversing through Mexico to reach the Mexico-US border? Duh. If Mexico was truly serious about controlling illegal immigration into the United States, why aren't Mexican troops stationed on the Mexican side of the border to prevent illegal "homesteading" on its side of the Mexico-US border? Duh.

As a successful businessman and proud citizen of the United States, I simply got tired of watching millions of homeless U.S. citizens, mostly White women and children, our veterans, chronically unemployed, and citizens with physical and mental disabilities forced to wait in line behind illegal immigrants who not only "cut to the front of the line" for taxpayer financial assistance, but many brought drugs, death, and terrorism into our country!

FAKE NEWS AND MEDIA:
Before I become President, while President, after my presidency, and during my entire re-election campaign all mainstream media (ABC, CBS, NBC, etc.) consistently and intentionally reported false or skewed information about me, my administration, and my family. Don't take my word for it, all you have to do is watch every late-night talk show, and "Real Time with Bill Maher," and ABC televison's "The View," and every mainstream media evening news program, and more.

Did you see the recent debate with Kamala Harris? As detailed in the video at right, which I did NOT
authorize or
offer any
consultation, ABC/Disney's bias against me is blatantly overt.

Even before the debate, this is how CBS intentionally "showcased" Harris' campaign and intentionally omitted the existence of my campaign.

It's clearly a "threat to democracy" when mainstream and social media intentionally use their combined power to manipulate voters by "showcasing" their preferred candidate over another.