Before reviewing this latest installment of the "Planet of the Apes" film franchise, let's begin with some key background information, and then identify subsequent problems that sequels, remakes or "re-imaginings" consistently failed to address.
BACKGROUND: The original 1968 film, "Planet of the Apes" had two things that all subsequent "Ape" films lacked: (1) Charlton Heston in the leading role; and (2) a compelling script that solidly delivered "awe and spectacle." This was an important combination because Academy Award winning actor Heston's status as a legendary actor from "the golden age of Hollywood" gave the film credibility to be viewed as a serious "film" instead of some low-budget "B" level science fiction drive-in "movie" made by Roger Corman, American International, or Hammer Films. Most importantly, Heston's acting ability lifted the film to be taken seriously. Plus, for those unfamiliar with the original book by Piere Boulle, the script was imaginative and compelling. In the late 1960s the race to land on the moon and space travel held great facination for many people around the world. "Planet of the Apes" was released nationally on April 3, 1968 and the first manned mission to land on the moon occurred fifteen-(15) months later on July 20, 1969. Clearly, the 1968 film took advantage of this interest by launching Heston and his team of astronauts into space within the first fifteen minutes of the film. Then, upon crash landing, Heston and his crew found themselves in a desolate place and quickly discovered a bizarre reality of awe and spectacle where their humanity had no value. As represented by the two film clips below, the original "Planet of the Apes" uniquely delivered "awe and spectacle" that none of the subsequent sequels or remakes delivered, and consequently, this franchise has been going downhill ever since.
DISCOVERY - AWE AND SPECTACLE FOR THE APES
(because all humans were primitive, had no language skills, and were unable to talk)
DISCOVERY - AWE AND SPECTACLE FOR HUMANITY (because we finally discover what happened to the great civilizations built by humans)
THE PLANET OF THE APES - ORIGINAL FILM SERIES
1968 4 STARS
1970
3.5 STARS
1971 2.5 STARS
1972
2 STARS
1973 1 STAR
Running Time
112 minutes
95 minutes
98 minutes
88 minutes
87 minutes
Budget
$5.8 million
$2.5 million
$2 million
$1.7 millions
$1.7 million
Box Office
$33.3 million
$19 million
$12.3 million
$9.7 million
$8.8 million
The Bottom Line
5.74 times greater box office revenue than budget
7.6 times greater box office revenue than budget
6.15 times greater box office revenue than budget
5.71 times greater box office revenue than budget
5.2 times greater box office revenue than budget
Notably, these films were efficiently produced as running times became shorter with each film, and as validated by "The Bottom Line" performance above, the return on investment (ROI) for the original five-(5) film franchise is greater than the 2001 remake (below), and greater than each of the four-(4) films in the "re-imagined" franchise launched in 2011 (below).
ASSESSMENT: The original 1968 film, "Planet of the Apes" was more than just a bunch of actors running around in monkey suits, it communicated key principles that none of the subsequent sequels or remakes addressed as a cornerstone to the future of ape-kind, specifically:
1. ape does not kill ape; and
2. ape is better than man.
Instead of evolving and exploring these principles to discover how a truly "enlightened" socio-economic futuristic ape culture might exist, we're confronted with scripts where apes engage in the same clichéd murderous and inhumane practices that defined and doomed humanity. Keep in mind, these "apes" (chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, etc.) are smarter, faster, stronger, and they have a much greater sense of family and community than humans. So, why didn't the subsequent films show the linear progression of their higher evolution? Instead, the ape culture never advanced. Even with better monkey suits, better special effects, no matter, we see the same film over and over and over and over again. Even the franchise reboot in 2001 offered the same old crap.
THE PLANET OF THE APES - 2001 REBOOT (FAILED)
Directed by Tim Burton; Screenplay
by William Broyles, Lawrence Konner and Mark Rosenthal.
Produced by Richard D. Zanuck.
Starring Mark Wahlberg (as
astronaut Leo Davidson), Tim Roth (as the evil
General Thade), Helena Bonham Carter (as Ari,
champion for human rights), Michael Clarke Duncan (as
Attar, the General's muscle guy), Kris Kristofferson (as Karubi, a militant human), and Estella Warren (as
Daena). Also starring Paul Giamatti (as Limbo) and Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa (as Krull).
This big budget "re-imagining" of
the 1968 original departs from both the classic science
fiction film and the source novel by author Pierre Boulle.
It doesn't make the film better. Mark Wahlberg stars as Leo
Davidson, an astronaut of the early twenty-first century
whose routine reconnaissance mission goes sour when he's
lost through a wormhole. Davidson crash-lands on a planet
where intelligent, talking apes are the dominant species and
humans exist as conquered slaves. A chimpanzee activist
named Ari (Helena Bonham Carter) who's sympathetic to
humans, and a beautiful human rebel, Daena (Estella Warren),
befriend Davidson who soon becomes the most prominent figure
in the human resistance movement. The villain, General
Thade, wants to crush Davidson immediately. General Thade is
deftly portrayed (as usual) by Tim Roth in easily the best
acting of the movie.
In a very typical and clichéd
screenplay Davidson always escapes the General's clutches.
Ditto to the General's trusted adjutant, Attar (Michael
Clarke Duncan), who also exudes great desire to crush the
burgeoning human uprising. Film falls apart in many
sequences including sets - that look like sets - and art
direction. Most notably, humans in this re-imagining clearly
appear to have greater intelligence and communication skills
than humans in the original film, but this re-imagining
provides no revelations as to why. This re-imagining also
climaxes in the Forbidden Zone but it's extraordinarily
anti-climatic at this point. Who cares? No one.
Next to Roth, the best thing about
this re-imagining is the original film's star Charlton
Heston in a cameo role as, ironically, the wisest of all
apes! In an interesting twist, Heston recites the same
dialogue from the original film - but from a different
perspective.
Film is directed episodically by Tim
("Batman" and "Batman Returns") Burton.
The Bottom Line: 3.62 times greater box office than budget
THE PLANET OF THE APES - 2011 SERIES REBOOT
Now, 43 years later, there's yet another reboot of this film franchise, albeit with state-of-the-art motion-capture-suits instead of monkey masks, and the latest in special effects, but these films cover the exact same ground. Boring. Repetitive. Unimaginative. Albert Einstein said it so clearly, “Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
Frankly, the first two installments of this re-imagined film franchise are not worthy of a review (see chart below). Therefore, given "lessons learned" by the producers and director from the first two films, let's skip to the third film, "War for the Planet of the Apes." Surely, the producers and director know better and improved the script, right? Nope, with a rating of -1 star, it was a mistake to even think about making this film in the first place.
Starring Andy Serkis (as the ape leader,
Caesar), Woody Harrelson (as military leader, The Colonel, representing the continued control of all humanity by White people because Black, Native American, Latino, and Asian people are, as usual, absent from any positions of control or leadership in this re-imaging of the future of humanity), Steve Zahn (as the Bad Ape), Karin Konoval (as
Maurice), Amiah Miller (as Nova), and Terry Notary (as
Rocket), Ty Olsson (as Red Donkey), Michael Adamthwaite (as Luca), Toby Kebbell (as Koba), Gabriel Chavarria (as Preacher), Judy Greer (as Cornelia), Sara Canning (as Lake), Devyn Dalton (as Cornelius), and a host of others.
Directed by Matt Reeves; Screenplay
by Mark Bomback and Matt Reeves; Based on Characters Created by Ricik Jaffa and Amanda Silver; Based on the original novel by Piere Boulle; Produced by Peter Chermin, Dylan Clark, Rick Jaffa, and Amanda Silver; Co-producer Ryan Stafford; Executive Producer Mark Bomback, Mary McLaglen, and Jenno Topping.
Here, yet again, the script covers the exact same ground: (1) apes want absolutely nothing to do with man; (2) man must kill every ape; and (3) in perpetual contradiction, apes must kill apes. Clearly, the scriptswriters used the template for "White privilege," where humans captured apes, orchestrated their genocide or enslavement, and due to man's arrogance . . . let's be specific, because "elite," politically powerful and affluent White men are the perpetual protagonists as the duplicity and inconsistency of their egalitarian principles collide with their authoritarian rule to eventfully screw-up everything. The aforementioned "plot device" is used to move the narrative "thematically," but can only be perceived by Native Americans and Black people not only as an insult, but as validation to never trust "elite," politically powerful and affluent White men. Again, to be as repetitive as all films in this reboot, how many times must "we" endure these boring, repetitive, and unimaginative scripts?
THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS AS REPETITIVE AS THIS FILM FRANCHISE: "Apes" (chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, etc.) are supposed to have evolved to be smarter, faster, and stronger than humans, and they have a much greater sense of family and community than humans. So why didn't these "re-imagined" subsequent films show the linear progression of their higher evolution, and in particular, the higher intelligence of apes? Instead, the ape culture never advanced. Yes, these apes have better monkey masks and motion-capture-suits, better special effects, nevertheless, we see the same film over and over and over and over again. These films exist as a smorgasbord for computer-generated special effect but nothing more. Here's a thought, what if the apes and humans were forced to team-up against a mutual threat . . .
OR
OR
It's so very, very tiring to watch these films as the running times get longer and longer and we're offered the same old crap. Since the original launch of this film franchise in 1968, budgets have perpetually increased as box office revenues have perpetually deminished; nevertheless, the ending of the latest film, "Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes," clearly suggests yet another sequel; let's hope not.
2011
1 star
2014
1 star
2017
-1 star
2024
-1 star
Direction
Rupert Wyatt's
direction is perfunctory and mediocre.
Matt Reeves' direction
is perfunctory and mediocre.
Matt Reeves' direction
is perfunctory and mediocre.
Wes Ball's direction is perfunctory, laborious, and mediocre.
Filmediting
Editing by Conrad Buff and Mark Goldblatt is perfunctory.
Editing by William Hoy and Stan Salfas is perfunctory.
Editing by William Hoy and Stan Salfas is perfunctory.
Editing by Dan Zimmerman and Dirk Westervelt is perfunctory.
Cinematography
Andrew Lesnie's cinematography is
dark and gloomy.
Michael Seresin's cinematography is consistent with the
dark and gloomy atmosphere
established by the
previous film.
Michael Seresin cinematography is consistent with the
dark and gloomy atmosphere
established by the two previous films in
this film franchise.
Gyuula Pados'
cinematography is consistent with the
dark and gloomy atmosphere
established for
this film franchise.
Screenwriters
Rick Jaffa and
Amanda Silver
Mark Bomback and
Rick Jaffa and
Amanda Silver
Mark Bomback and
Matt Reeves
Josh Friedman
Running Time
105 minutes
130 minutes
140 minutes
145 minutes
Budget
$93 million
$170 to $235 million
$150 to $190 million
$160 million
Box Office
$481.8 million
$710.6 million
$490.7 million
$397.3 million
The Bottom Line
5.18 times greater box office revenue than budget
3.02 times greater box office revenue than budget
2.58 times greater box office revenue than budget
2.48 times greater box office revenue than budget
Recommendation: Buy the original 1968 film, "Planet of the Apes," and call it a day.